Literature collection of the CovAmInf workgroup.
Editors
Joshua T. Berryman
Abdul Mannan Baig
Artemi Bendandi
Daniel Bonhenry
Mattheos A.G. Koffas
Associations between air pollution and multimorbidity in the UK Biobank: A cross-sectional study (2022)
Amy Ronaldson, Jorge Arias de la Torre, Mark Ashworth, Anna L. Hansell, Matthew Hotopf, Ian Mudway, Rob Stewart, Alex Dregan, Ioannis Bakolis
PubMed: 36530697 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1035415
"Multimorbidity" is defined as the co-existence of two or more long-term conditions such as chronic neurological or respiratory diseases. These diseases may be related to some extent, as clusters (the term "meta-syndrome" is not used but would be handy in this context). The paper, based on UK Biobank data, notes that previous studies in China have identified that very low air pollution is associated with a muscular-skeletal multimorbidity cluster (i.e. people living in rural China become ill from long physical work) and that high air pollution, in particular the smallest resolved particulates, PM2.5, are associated with a cardio-metabolic cluster of diseases.
The present UK study found comparable high levels of harm from PM2.5 (again, the finest category studied) and NO2, with the "neurological" cluster of co-morbidities very interestingly being the most significant category for both major causes, followed by the respiratory group. Cardiovascular, pain-related, and mental health clusters were highly significant for both PM2.5 and NO2, but in different orderings. The neurological cluster of co-morbidities did not explicitly include neurodegenerative disease, possibly because of difficulties in diagnosis, but did include epilepsy which is a common manifestation of neurodegeneration as well as stroke and alcohol/substance dependency. Depression, another typical manifestation of neurodegenerative disease, was one factor in the "mental health" co-morbidity cluster. Combining the neurological and mental-health clusters would create a super-category with very highly augmented risk following either PM2.5 or NO2 chronic exposure.
The large size of the UK biobank data made it possible to control effectively for ethnic and sociodemographic covariates.
A peeriodical is a lightweight virtual journal with you as the Editor-in-chief, giving you complete freedom in setting editorial policy to select the most interesting and useful manuscripts for your readers. The manuscripts you will evaluate and select are existing publications—preprints and papers. Thus, a peeriodical replicates all the functions of a traditional journal, including discovery, selection and certification, except publication itself.
Why set up a peeriodical? The traditional journal has changed remarkably little in centuries and many people feel that scientific publishing is stuck in a rut, subject to a corporatist drift, and is not serving science optimally. The advent of preprints in many fields beyond those served by the ArXiv is liberating the dissemination of research, but most other journal functions have not been replaced effectively. Now you—all researchers—have the opportunity to select and certify research according to your own criteria. We expect peeriodical subject matters and editorial policies to be extremely varied. Some peeriodicals may wish to target narrow domains, while others will adopt a generalist approach. Some peeriodicals will be inclusive, focusing on discovery, whereas others may aim to enforce stringent quality criteria, prioritising certification. The point is that all approaches are permitted and supported—we hope you will innovate! You can create multiple peeriodicals. It will be users and readers who decide which peeriodicals they find useful and interesting. Users can sign up to receive alerts from any peeriodical they wish.
A peeriodical has one or more editors. Anybody can set-up a peeriodical and either operate it alone or invite colleagues to form an editorial board or community. The editors can select "manuscripts"—existing papers or preprints—to consider, either spontaneously or through suggestions from other researchers, including of course the authors. Note that there is no obligation that the manuscript be recent; for instance, we expect that some peeriodicals could focus on underappreciated classics. After all, predictions about scientific impact are generally more accurate for the past than the future. If the editors wish, they can solicit reviews for the manuscript via the Peeriodicals interface. Reviews will be published and the referees will have the option of posting anonymously or signing their review. Editors may decide at any time to accept, reject or comment on the manuscript, taking into account the comments received. They may of course suggest improvements to the manuscript or underlying study. If they justify their decision, their editorial decision will also be published.
How will Peeriodicals fit into the publishing landscape? We see them as a space without entry barriers in which researchers can innovate and explore new approaches to scientific dissemination, in parallel to the traditional publishing industry. There are related and complementary initiatives, notably the overlay journals promoted by Tim Gowers, exemplified by Discrete Analysis, but also Science Open Collections, PLoS Channels, the APPRAISE initiative and Peer Community in... Each of these projects has their own specificities and goals. Nobody yet knows exactly what the future will look like, but we strongly believe that we are about to experience a period of rapid evolution in the dissemination of science and we hope that Peeriodicals will inspire and help you to share your imagination and expertise with the whole research community.
For those starting a peeriodical, you will discover that the hardest part is building up an audience. Unfortunately, we can't yet guarantee you the exposure you would get from a paper in a glamour journal. Reviews with scientific content will be mirrored on PubPeer, offering an audience through the PubPeer browser and Zotero extensions. However, it will be largely up to you to run your publicity, most likely through social media. We are on Twitter (@PEERIODICALS) and will of course help out as we can.
Get started now by requesting an invitation with the link in the top right menu.